Telkom at it
again
ADSL
South Africa (Broadband South Africa), 28 January
2007
Telkom is
at it again. The suspension of a 75-year-old widow’s
landline under very suspicious
circumstances leaves one cold to say the
least.
Most people, especially when retired, want to
enjoy life without having to worry about things that are
supposed to be straightforward. For one you want to pick up the
phone and talk to your grandchildren without having to move
mountains. Telkom however clearly seems to have a totally
different take on things as Sheila Paul of Durbanville found
out. Not only has Telkom waste her money but also her valuable
time.
Let’s explain. Sheila applied for the
transfer of her phone to her new address. Telkom’s technicians
were suppose to transfer the line on October 30 but ‘had kept
neither that appointment nor others in the ensuing months’ (‘I
won’t pay for a Telkom line I don’t have,’ 23 January 2007).
‘Nobody at Telkom had given any reasons for
the non-appearance of technicians in October, November,
December and this month’ (‘I won’t pay for a Telkom line I don’t
have,’ 23 January 2007).
To make
things worse Telkom ‘had begun to
bill her for a telephone jack that had not yet been installed,
and for Surfmore time on a computer she was unable to use
without a landline’ (‘I won’t pay for a Telkom line I don’t
have,’ 23 January 2007). The best part is yet to
come…
All Sheila’s efforts to contact Telkom have
so far fall on deaf ears. She gave up after she could no longer
afford to use her cellphone to reach them, ‘thanks to long
waits to be connected to someone willing or able to assist her’
(‘I won’t pay for a Telkom line I don’t have,’ 23 January
2007). Well, let’s be honest, chances are better to win the
Lotto than to be number one in line when contacting Telkom.
While one can understand this, it’s difficult to grasp why no
one was willing or able to assist her.
"I have spent a fortune on cellphone
airtime and am sick of listening to Telkom's music. I am
a widow and not in good health. Can't anything be done
about this sort of treatment?"
Telkom on the
other hand made it clear that they have suspended Sheila’s
account because of an outstanding amount. Telkom also added:
"Several attempts at reaching the customer through her mobile
number were unsuccessful…" (‘I won’t pay for a Telkom line I don’t
have,’ 23 January 2007). Sheila denied Telkom’s claims:
"They have got a cheek to tell me that they
haven't given me a line because I haven't paid my bill. What
have I got to pay for?" And "If they had transferred the phone
they would have been paid. If they check my records they will
see that my payments have always been prompt, and that no
account has ever been outstanding." Also, "My mobile phone is
with me all the time. If there is a missed call, I call
back" (‘I won’t pay
for a Telkom line I don’t have,’ 23 January
2007).
Who’s lying, Telkom or
Sheila?
Well, we at ADSL South Africa won’t lose
sleep over choosing Sheila’s side. We know from personal
experience that Telkom is not keen to defend the truth. Why in
the first place should an old lady like Sheila want to spend
her days taking Telkom for a ride?
ADSL South
Africa (Broadband South Africa)
deplores the way Telkom keep on
taking decent South Africans for a
ride.

|